Elicit: Standard of Care in Acute Kidney Injury (public)
What is the standard of care for acute kidney injury?
Acute kidney injury standard care includes delayed rather than preemptive renal replacement therapy initiation, standard dosing targets, modality selection based on patient hemodynamics and resources, and care bundles with early nephrology consultation.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury care relies on initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) only when conventional indications are present rather than preemptively. Large randomized trials and meta-analyses note that early or accelerated initiation does not reduce 90‐day mortality and may lead to more adverse events, as many patients in delayed arms avoid RRT altogether. Standard dosing targets provide outcomes similar to intensified regimens, and modality choice—whether continuous therapies, intermittent hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis—is guided by patient hemodynamic status, local expertise, and resource availability (with peritoneal dialysis endorsed by the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis). Additionally, care bundles aligned with best practice guidelines and early nephrology involvement improve process measures such as AKI recognition and documentation, with some studies reporting reductions in progression and rehospitalization.
Methods
We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 1000, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 6 key aspects that mattered most to the research question.
Data extraction
We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.
- Study Design:
Specify the exact type of study design (e.g., randomized controlled trial, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort).
- Setting and Context:
Describe the specific healthcare setting where the study was conducted.
- Participant Population:
Describe the key characteristics of study participants:
Total number of participants
Inclusion criteria for AKI
Severity of AKI (using standard staging criteria)
Mean/median age
Gender distribution
Key comorbidities
Intervention Details:
Describe the specific intervention for AKI management:
Detailed components of the intervention
Who delivered the intervention
Frequency and duration of intervention
Primary Outcomes:
List all primary outcomes measured:
Specify exact outcome measures
Include statistical results (means, percentages, p-values)
Risk of Bias Assessment:
Assess potential sources of bias:
- Randomization method (for RCTs)
- Blinding procedures
Results
Characteristics of Included Studies
| Study | Study Focus | Population | Intervention/Topic | Key Outcomes Measured | Full text retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sohaney et al., 2020 | Timing of Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT) initiation in Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) | 3,019 critically ill adults with Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 2/3 AKI | Accelerated vs. standard KRT initiation | 90-day mortality, KRT dependence, adverse events | No |
| Kolhe et al., 2015 | AKI care bundle implementation | 2,297 patients, 2,500 AKI episodes | AKI care bundle with electronic alert | In-hospital case fatality, AKI progression | Yes |
| Thanapongsatorn et al., 2021 | Multidisciplinary post-AKI care | 98 AKI stage 2-3 survivors | Multidisciplinary Care Team (MDCT) post-AKI care vs. standard | Feasibility, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), albuminuria, Blood Pressure (BP) control | Yes |
Summary
The included studies reported that the standard of care for acute kidney injury includes:
- Initiation of renal replacement therapy for conventional indications, not preemptively, in critically ill acute kidney injury.
- Use of standard renal replacement therapy dosing targets; higher intensity did not improve outcomes in the studies reviewed.
- Modality selection based on patient context, with peritoneal dialysis as a viable option according to International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines.
- Implementation of care bundles and early nephrology involvement, which improved process measures and may reduce adverse outcomes.