Elicit: Interventional Trials in Metastatic Head and Neck SCC (CT, public)

Interventional Trials in Metastatic Head and Neck SCC (CT, public)

phase 3 metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck that started after 2015 that are also interventional and industry sponsored

Twenty-one phase 3, interventional, industry-sponsored trials in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have been initiated since 2015, with varying current status ranging from recruiting to terminated.

Abstract

Twenty-one phase 3, interventional, industry‐sponsored trials in metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma initiated after 2015 have been registered. Fifteen trials evaluate anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents as single agents or in combination, while 12 assess these agents paired with novel immunotherapies (for example, bispecific antibodies, vaccines, fusion proteins) or with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemotherapy, or anti–EGFR therapy.

Seventeen studies list overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate as primary endpoints but have not reported results. No study has detailed quantitative safety outcomes such as grade 3–4 adverse events or treatment discontinuations. Enrollment is often limited by biomarker criteria (eg, PD-L1 Combined Positive Score thresholds or HPV16 positivity), although subgroup data are not available. Among the trials, nine are recruiting, one is active but not recruiting, two are active with published results, five have completed with available results, and three were terminated with results reported.

Methods

We analyzed 38 sources from an initial pool of 500, using 7 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question. More on methods

Papers identified with Elicit search

n = 500

Papers screened using:

n = 500

Papers screened out

n = 462

Papers included for extraction

n = 38

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

We considered all screening questions together and made a holistic judgement about whether to screen in each paper.

Data extraction

We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.

Extract the specific study type (e.g., interventional) and exact phase (e.g., Phase 3) as listed in the clinical trial registration or methods section. If multiple phases are mentioned (e.g., Phase 2/3), record both.

Verification steps:

Acceptable responses include:

Identify the primary sponsor of the study. Look for:

Verification steps:

If multiple sponsors exist, list the primary industry sponsor. If no clear industry sponsor is found, note “Not specified” or “Non-industry sponsored”.

Extract key inclusion and exclusion criteria specific to:

Specific focus areas:

If criteria are complex, summarize the most important points. Use direct quotes from eligibility criteria when possible.

List all countries where the study is being conducted.

Extraction method:

Example format:

Describe the primary intervention in detail:

Extraction guidelines:

Example format: “Zanzalintinib (XL092) + Pembrolizumab” or “Cisplatin plus Raltitrexed concurrent with Radiotherapy”

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Study ID Intervention Type Primary Endpoints Trial Status
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2025a Pembrolizumab (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) + radiotherapy with or without cisplatin Event-free survival Active, not recruiting
AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2025 Ficlatuzumab + cetuximab vs placebo + cetuximab Efficacy (Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival), safety Recruiting
Merus N.V., 2025a Petosemtamab + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab Efficacy, safety Recruiting
Merus N.V., 2025b Petosemtamab vs investigator’s choice monotherapy Efficacy, safety Recruiting
GlaxoSmithKline and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2024a GSK3359609 + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab Efficacy (Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival), safety Terminated, results available
Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc., 2025 INBRX-106 + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab Efficacy, safety Recruiting
Akeso, 2024 AK112 + AK117 vs pembrolizumab Efficacy, safety Recruiting
Incyte Corporation and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2025 Pembrolizumab + epacadostat vs pembrolizumab vs EXTREME regimen (cetuximab, platinum, and 5-fluorouracil) Efficacy, safety Active, not recruiting, results available
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Eisai Inc., 2025a Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib vs pembrolizumab + placebo Objective Response Rate, Progression-Free Survival, Overall Survival Completed, results available
PDS Biotechnology Corp., 2025 PDS0101 + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab Overall Survival, Objective Response Rate, Disease Control Rate, Duration of Response, Progression-Free Survival Recruiting

Summary of intervention types:

Summary of trial status:

Summary of primary endpoints:

Summary of findings:

Safety and Tolerability

Study ID Grade 3-4 Adverse Events Treatment Discontinuation Notable Safety Findings
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2025a No mention found No mention found No mention found
AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2025 No mention found No mention found No mention found
Merus N.V., 2025a No mention found No mention found No mention found
Merus N.V., 2025b No mention found No mention found No mention found
GlaxoSmithKline and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2024a No mention found No mention found No mention found
Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc., 2025 No mention found No mention found No mention found
Akeso, 2024 No mention found No mention found No mention found
Incyte Corporation and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2025 No mention found No mention found No mention found
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Eisai Inc., 2025a No mention found No mention found No mention found
PDS Biotechnology Corp., 2025 No mention found No mention found No mention found

Summary of findings:

Subgroup Analyses

Biomarker-Based Outcomes

Regional Variations

Discussion