Elicit: Bio-Based Silicone Alternatives for Hair Conditioning (public)
Bio-Based Silicone Alternatives for Hair Conditioning
Which bio-based silicone alternatives match hair conditioning while cutting micro-plastic release?
Chitin-derived compounds are the only bio-based alternatives that both condition hair and reduce microplastic waste.
Abstract
Several studies report that a range of bio‐based alternatives achieve hair‐conditioning benefits. Plant-based oils (e.g., Brazil nut and olive oils) improve break force, reduce combing force, and enhance shine. Marine-derived peptides yield smoother surface morphology with less fragmentation, while bio-based polymers (such as waterborne polyurethanes and cationic cellulose) improve moisture uptake and silicone deposition. Novel surfactants (for example, Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine and keratin-based surfactants), chitosan-based formulations, protein-based conditioners (such as cetearamidoethyl diethonium hydrolyzed protein), and plant extracts also demonstrate improvements in friction, contact angle, and hair strength.
Regarding environmental impact, several alternatives are reported to be biodegradable. Among the candidates, chitin-derived compounds alone show evidence of reducing plastic waste, suggesting a potential to cut microplastic release. Formulation and processing details—such as emulsification behavior, pH sensitivity, and particle size control—further inform performance, yet only chitin-derived compounds directly address the microplastic concern alongside robust hair conditioning.
Methods
We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 500, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question. More on methods.
Papers identified with Elicit search
- n = 500
Papers screened using: Bio-based Alternative Focus, Hair Conditioning Properties, Study Type, Scientific Rigor, Performance Data, Environmental Impact, Hair Care Relevance, Comparative Analysis
- n = 500
Papers screened out
- n = 460
Papers included for extraction
- n = 40
Screening
We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:
- Bio-based Alternative Focus: Does the study examine bio-based (not synthetic) alternatives to silicone in hair care products?
- Hair Conditioning Properties: Does the study include quantitative measurements of hair conditioning performance metrics?
- Study Type: Is the study either (a) an original research article with laboratory data, (b) a comparative study, or (c) a systematic review/meta-analysis?
- Scientific Rigor: Is the study published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented in a scientific conference proceedings (not marketing materials or product claims)?
- Performance Data: Does the study include experimental data on material properties relevant to hair care applications?
- Environmental Impact: Does the study include measurements or analysis of environmental impact (such as biodegradability or microplastic release)?
- Hair Care Relevance: Are the bio-based materials specifically studied for their application in hair care products?
- Comparative Analysis: Does the study include direct comparison with conventional silicone-based ingredients or established performance benchmarks?
We considered all screening questions together and made a holistic judgement about whether to screen in each paper.
Data extraction
We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.
Study Design Type:
Identify the type of study design used:
- Experimental laboratory study
- Comparative analysis
- Theoretical/review study
- Formulation development study
Specific Research Focus:
Extract the primary research objective or focus of the study. Look in the introduction or objectives section. Specifically note:
- Whether the study focuses on bio-based alternatives
- Whether micro-plastic reduction is addressed
- Specific hair conditioning mechanisms examined
Bio-based Conditioning Agent Characteristics:
Extract details about the bio-based conditioning agent:
- Chemical/molecular name
- Origin (plant-based, marine-based, etc.)
- Specific chemical properties
- Molecular structure (if provided)
Performance Metrics:
Identify specific performance measurements for the conditioning agent:
- Conditioning effectiveness metrics
- Micro-plastic release measurements
- Comparative performance against traditional silicone agents
Biodegradability and Ecological Impact:
Extract information about:
- Biodegradation rate
- Aquatic toxicity measurements
- Environmental sustainability metrics
Results
Characteristics of Included Studies
| Bio-based Alternative Type | Study Design | Performance Metrics | Environmental Assessment Method | Full text retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Octyldodecyl myristate, Glyceryl oleate | Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development | Restoration of hydrophobicity, reduction in friction, wet and dry combing work | No mention found | No |
| Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA) | Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development | Sensorial profile, combing force reductions | No mention found | No |
| Chitosan | Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development | No mention found | No mention found | No |
| Hyaluronic acid (HA) | Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study | Wet combing force, rheology, surface tension | No mention found | No |
| Waterborne polyurethanes (CWPU) | Experimental laboratory study, Formulation development study | Young’s modulus, elongation at break, moisture uptake | No mention found | No |
| Brazil nut oil, Olive oil | Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis | Break force, combing force, shine | No mention found | Yes |
| Pneumatophorus japonicus heads peptides (PHP) | Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis | Surface morphology, fragmentation, roughness, gloss, amino acid content | No mention found | Yes |
| Cationic guar gum (CGG) | Theoretical/review study, Formulation development study | Friction behavior, shear stress | No mention found | No |
| Keratin based quaternary ammonium salt surfactant (E-K) | Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study | Surface tension, critical micelle concentration, HLB value, isoelectric point | BOD5/CODCr value | No |
Effects of Bio-based Alternatives
Conditioning Performance
| Alternative Type | Conditioning Effectiveness | Durability | Consumer Acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant-based oils (e.g., Brazil nut oil, Olive oil) | Improved break force, reduced combing force, increased shine | No mention found | No mention found |
| Marine-derived peptides (e.g., PHP) | Improved surface morphology, reduced fragmentation and roughness, enhanced gloss | No mention found | No mention found |
| Bio-based polymers (e.g., CWPU, cationic cellulose) | Improved Young’s modulus, elongation at break, moisture uptake; Enhanced silicone oil deposition | No mention found | No mention found |
| Novel surfactants (e.g., Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA), E-K) | Improved sensorial profile, reduced combing force; Good surface activity and emulsifying ability | No mention found | No mention found |
| Chitosan-based | Improved adsorption and coating stability | No mention found | No mention found |
| Protein-based (e.g., Cetearamidoethyl diethonium hydrolyzed protein (CDHP)) | Improved contact angle, reduced friction, better combing performance | No mention found | No mention found |
Environmental Impact
| Alternative Type | Biodegradability | Microplastic Release | Sustainability Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA) | Improved biodegradation compared to current cationic surfactants | No mention found | No mention found |
| Keratin-based surfactant (E-K) | Easily biodegradable (BOD5/CODCr value) | No mention found | No mention found |
| Cationic dextran (catDex) | Described as biodegradable | No mention found | No mention found |
| Chitin-derived compounds | Biodegradable | Potential to reduce plastic waste | No mention found |
| Pracaxi oil | No mention found | No mention found | Contributes to environmental restoration |
| Plant-based esterquats | No mention found | No mention found | 88% renewable carbon index |
Processing and Application Considerations
Manufacturing Requirements
- Formulation techniques:
- Zhou et al. (2024) demonstrated that the presence of cellulose nanocrystals improved the emulsifying properties of cationic cellulose
- Processing conditions:
- Ajayi et al. (2021) investigated the impact of process mixing speed on the rheological, tribological, and wet lubrication performance of a novel amino lipid hair conditioner
- Particle size control:
- Haake et al. (2010) found that particle size was a crucial factor in determining the amount of wax deposited on shampooed hair
- Compatibility with existing formulations:
- Li et al. (2022) emphasized the importance of ensuring compatibility between novel bio-based ingredients and commercial surfactants commonly used in hair care products
Stability and Formulation
- pH sensitivity:
- Some bio-based alternatives, like Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA), show pH-dependent behavior, converting into a cationic surfactant at acidic pH
- Emulsion stability:
- Zhou et al. (2024) focused on developing stable silicone oil emulsions using cellulose-based complexes
- Hydration and swelling:
- Ormeño-Martínez et al. (2024) noted that the hydration of deposited chitosan-based films increases with polymer concentration and ionic strength
- Thermal stability:
- Rodrigues et al. (2020) included thermogravimetric analysis in their evaluations
- Synergistic effects:
- Fernandes et al. (2023) discussed the use of hyaluronic acid in combination with biosurfactants or biobased surfactants
References
- Valentin Goussard, J. Aubry, V. Nardello‐Rataj (2022). Bio-based alternatives to volatile silicones: Relationships between chemical structure, physicochemical properties and functional performances. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.
- Catarina Fernandes, B. Medronho, L. Alves, M. Rasteiro (2023). On Hair Care Physicochemistry: From Structure and Degradation to Novel Biobased Conditioning Agents. Polymers.
- Ziyong Zhou, Junxin Xu, Shiyun Zhu, Bin Wang, Jun Li, and 2 more (2024). A gentle conditioning agent consisted of oppositely-charged-induced cellulose nanocrystal and cationic cellulose: Stability, conditioning and delivery. Journal of Cleaner Production.
- Zhaoting Liu, Katja Graf, Jochen Hub, M. Kellermeier (2022). Effects of Cosmetic Emulsions on the Surface Properties of Mongolian Hair. ACS Omega.
- P. Morganti, G. Morganti, M. Coltelli (2021). Smart and Sustainable Hair Products Based on Chitin-Derived Compounds. Cosmetics.
- Laura Fernández-Peña, E. Guzmán, F. Léonforté, Ana Serrano-Pueyo, Krzysztof Regulski, and 4 more (2020). Effect of molecular structure of eco-friendly glycolipid biosurfactants on the adsorption of hair-care conditioning polymers. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.
- Benjamin J. Coscia, J. Shelley, A. Browning, J. Sanders, R. Chaudret, and 4 more (2023). Shearing friction behaviour of synthetic polymers compared to a functionalized polysaccharide on biomimetic surfaces: models for the prediction of performance of eco-designed formulations. Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP.