Elicit: Bio-Based Silicone Alternatives for Hair Conditioning (public)

Bio-Based Silicone Alternatives for Hair Conditioning

Which bio-based silicone alternatives match hair conditioning while cutting micro-plastic release?

Chitin-derived compounds are the only bio-based alternatives that both condition hair and reduce microplastic waste.

Abstract

Several studies report that a range of bio‐based alternatives achieve hair‐conditioning benefits. Plant-based oils (e.g., Brazil nut and olive oils) improve break force, reduce combing force, and enhance shine. Marine-derived peptides yield smoother surface morphology with less fragmentation, while bio-based polymers (such as waterborne polyurethanes and cationic cellulose) improve moisture uptake and silicone deposition. Novel surfactants (for example, Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine and keratin-based surfactants), chitosan-based formulations, protein-based conditioners (such as cetearamidoethyl diethonium hydrolyzed protein), and plant extracts also demonstrate improvements in friction, contact angle, and hair strength.

Regarding environmental impact, several alternatives are reported to be biodegradable. Among the candidates, chitin-derived compounds alone show evidence of reducing plastic waste, suggesting a potential to cut microplastic release. Formulation and processing details—such as emulsification behavior, pH sensitivity, and particle size control—further inform performance, yet only chitin-derived compounds directly address the microplastic concern alongside robust hair conditioning.

Methods

We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 500, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question. More on methods.

Papers identified with Elicit search

Papers screened using: Bio-based Alternative Focus, Hair Conditioning Properties, Study Type, Scientific Rigor, Performance Data, Environmental Impact, Hair Care Relevance, Comparative Analysis

Papers screened out

Papers included for extraction

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

We considered all screening questions together and made a holistic judgement about whether to screen in each paper.

Data extraction

We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.

Study Design Type:

Identify the type of study design used:

Specific Research Focus:

Extract the primary research objective or focus of the study. Look in the introduction or objectives section. Specifically note:

Bio-based Conditioning Agent Characteristics:

Extract details about the bio-based conditioning agent:

Performance Metrics:

Identify specific performance measurements for the conditioning agent:

Biodegradability and Ecological Impact:

Extract information about:

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Bio-based Alternative Type Study Design Performance Metrics Environmental Assessment Method Full text retrieved
Octyldodecyl myristate, Glyceryl oleate Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development Restoration of hydrophobicity, reduction in friction, wet and dry combing work No mention found No
Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA) Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development Sensorial profile, combing force reductions No mention found No
Chitosan Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis, Formulation development No mention found No mention found No
Hyaluronic acid (HA) Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study Wet combing force, rheology, surface tension No mention found No
Waterborne polyurethanes (CWPU) Experimental laboratory study, Formulation development study Young’s modulus, elongation at break, moisture uptake No mention found No
Brazil nut oil, Olive oil Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis Break force, combing force, shine No mention found Yes
Pneumatophorus japonicus heads peptides (PHP) Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study, Comparative analysis Surface morphology, fragmentation, roughness, gloss, amino acid content No mention found Yes
Cationic guar gum (CGG) Theoretical/review study, Formulation development study Friction behavior, shear stress No mention found No
Keratin based quaternary ammonium salt surfactant (E-K) Formulation development study, Experimental laboratory study Surface tension, critical micelle concentration, HLB value, isoelectric point BOD5/CODCr value No

Effects of Bio-based Alternatives

Conditioning Performance

Alternative Type Conditioning Effectiveness Durability Consumer Acceptance
Plant-based oils (e.g., Brazil nut oil, Olive oil) Improved break force, reduced combing force, increased shine No mention found No mention found
Marine-derived peptides (e.g., PHP) Improved surface morphology, reduced fragmentation and roughness, enhanced gloss No mention found No mention found
Bio-based polymers (e.g., CWPU, cationic cellulose) Improved Young’s modulus, elongation at break, moisture uptake; Enhanced silicone oil deposition No mention found No mention found
Novel surfactants (e.g., Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA), E-K) Improved sensorial profile, reduced combing force; Good surface activity and emulsifying ability No mention found No mention found
Chitosan-based Improved adsorption and coating stability No mention found No mention found
Protein-based (e.g., Cetearamidoethyl diethonium hydrolyzed protein (CDHP)) Improved contact angle, reduced friction, better combing performance No mention found No mention found

Environmental Impact

Alternative Type Biodegradability Microplastic Release Sustainability Score
Behenamidopropyl Dimethylamine (BAPDMA) Improved biodegradation compared to current cationic surfactants No mention found No mention found
Keratin-based surfactant (E-K) Easily biodegradable (BOD5/CODCr value) No mention found No mention found
Cationic dextran (catDex) Described as biodegradable No mention found No mention found
Chitin-derived compounds Biodegradable Potential to reduce plastic waste No mention found
Pracaxi oil No mention found No mention found Contributes to environmental restoration
Plant-based esterquats No mention found No mention found 88% renewable carbon index

Processing and Application Considerations

Manufacturing Requirements

Stability and Formulation

References

  1. Valentin Goussard, J. Aubry, V. Nardello‐Rataj (2022). Bio-based alternatives to volatile silicones: Relationships between chemical structure, physicochemical properties and functional performances. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science.
  2. Catarina Fernandes, B. Medronho, L. Alves, M. Rasteiro (2023). On Hair Care Physicochemistry: From Structure and Degradation to Novel Biobased Conditioning Agents. Polymers.
  3. Ziyong Zhou, Junxin Xu, Shiyun Zhu, Bin Wang, Jun Li, and 2 more (2024). A gentle conditioning agent consisted of oppositely-charged-induced cellulose nanocrystal and cationic cellulose: Stability, conditioning and delivery. Journal of Cleaner Production.
  4. Zhaoting Liu, Katja Graf, Jochen Hub, M. Kellermeier (2022). Effects of Cosmetic Emulsions on the Surface Properties of Mongolian Hair. ACS Omega.
  5. P. Morganti, G. Morganti, M. Coltelli (2021). Smart and Sustainable Hair Products Based on Chitin-Derived Compounds. Cosmetics.
  6. Laura Fernández-Peña, E. Guzmán, F. Léonforté, Ana Serrano-Pueyo, Krzysztof Regulski, and 4 more (2020). Effect of molecular structure of eco-friendly glycolipid biosurfactants on the adsorption of hair-care conditioning polymers. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.
  7. Benjamin J. Coscia, J. Shelley, A. Browning, J. Sanders, R. Chaudret, and 4 more (2023). Shearing friction behaviour of synthetic polymers compared to a functionalized polysaccharide on biomimetic surfaces: models for the prediction of performance of eco-designed formulations. Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP.