Elicit: Effects of Rent Control on Housing Dynamics (public)

Effects of Rent Control on Housing Dynamics (public)

What are the effects of rent control policies on housing market dynamics and tenant stability?

Rent control policies yield mixed results, decreasing rents in controlled units by 4-47% and extending tenant stays by up to six years, while simultaneously reducing housing supply and increasing eviction filings, with effects varying by policy design and local market conditions.

Abstract

Rent control policies yield mixed effects on housing market dynamics and tenant stability. In regulated markets, studies report rent declines ranging from 4% to 47% in controlled units while some analyses note rent increases in uncontrolled or post‐decontrol sectors. In one San Francisco study, rents rose concurrently with a 15% reduction in housing supply and a 20% drop in tenant mobility. Other research documents tenants staying an extra six years under tighter regulation, although reports of 83–127% higher eviction filings suggest displacement risks in certain settings.

Methods

We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 989, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question.

Papers identified with Elicit search

Papers screened using:

Papers screened out

Papers included for extraction

Paper search

Using your research question "What are the effects of rent control policies on housing market dynamics and tenant stability?", we searched across over 126 million academic papers from the Semantic Scholar corpus. We retrieved the 989 papers most relevant to the query.

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

We considered all screening questions together and made a holistic judgement about whether to screen in each paper.

Data extraction

We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.

Study Design Type

Geographic Setting and Context

Rent Control Policy Details

Policy Impact Outcomes

Key Quantitative Findings

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Study Location Policy Type Primary Outcomes Measured Methodology
Diamond et al., 2019 San Francisco, USA; 1994 onward Not explicitly labeled Rental prices, housing supply, tenant stability, maintenance Quasi-experimental
Jofre-Monseny et al., 2023 Catalonia, Spain; 2020 Not specified Rental prices, housing supply Difference-in-differences
Munch & Svarer Denmark Not specified Tenancy duration, mobility Econometric study
... ... ... ... ...

Across 40 studies of rent control policies, the following patterns were observed:

Effects

Effects on Housing Market Dynamics

Study Outcome Measure Effect Direction Effect Size Statistical Significance
Diamond et al., 2019a Market rents, supply Increase in rents, decrease in supply 15% supply reduction, 20% decrease in mobility No mention found
Jofre-Monseny et al., 2023 Average rents Decrease in rents 4–6% reduction No mention found
Munch & Svarer Tenancy duration Increase in duration +6 years No mention found

Effects on Tenant Stability and Demographics

Study Outcome Measure Effect Direction Effect Size Statistical Significance
Gyourko & Linneman, 1989 Rent subsidy, tenure Increase in subsidy, increase in tenure $2440/year, significant tenure increase 95% confidence interval: $2367–$2511
... ... ... ... ...

Conclusion

Raising revenue for rental subsidies through rent control appears to be regressive, as corporations can evade the tax burden more easily.

References