Elicit: Effects of Rent Control on Housing Dynamics (public)
Effects of Rent Control on Housing Dynamics (public)
What are the effects of rent control policies on housing market dynamics and tenant stability?
Rent control policies yield mixed results, decreasing rents in controlled units by 4-47% and extending tenant stays by up to six years, while simultaneously reducing housing supply and increasing eviction filings, with effects varying by policy design and local market conditions.
Abstract
Rent control policies yield mixed effects on housing market dynamics and tenant stability. In regulated markets, studies report rent declines ranging from 4% to 47% in controlled units while some analyses note rent increases in uncontrolled or post‐decontrol sectors. In one San Francisco study, rents rose concurrently with a 15% reduction in housing supply and a 20% drop in tenant mobility. Other research documents tenants staying an extra six years under tighter regulation, although reports of 83–127% higher eviction filings suggest displacement risks in certain settings.
Separate analyses show shifts in market composition. For example, one study cited annual rent subsidies of about US$2440 (roughly 27% of income), and another observed reduced racial disparities accompanied by increased minority presence. These findings, based on quasi‐experimental and econometric approaches across diverse jurisdictions, indicate that the impacts of rent control vary with policy design and local market conditions.
Methods
We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 989, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question.
Papers identified with Elicit search
- n = 989
Papers screened using:
Intervention Type
Outcome Measures
Study Design
Geographic Context
Public/Social Housing Focus
Housing Voucher/Assistance Focus
Empirical Data
Comparison Groups
n = 989
Papers screened out
- n = 949
Papers included for extraction
- n = 40
Results
Characteristics of Included Studies
| Study | Study Location/Period | Rent Control Policy Type | Primary Outcomes Measured | Methodology | Full text retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond et al., 2019a | San Francisco, USA; 1994 onward | Not explicitly labeled; limits rent increases, multi-family 2-4 units built 1900-1990 | Rental prices, housing supply, tenant stability, maintenance | Quasi-experimental | Yes |
| Jofre-Monseny et al., 2023 | Catalonia, Spain; 2020 | Not specified; price caps, high coverage | Rental prices, housing supply | Difference-in-differences, event-study, quasi-experimental | No |
| Munch & Svarer, “Rent Control and Tenancy Duration” | Denmark | Not specified in abstract | Tenancy duration, mobility | Econometric study | No |
| Mense et al., 2017 | Germany; 2015 | Second-generation; exception for new units | Rental prices, land values, supply, maintenance | Difference-in-differences with discontinuity, quasi-experimental | No |
| Breidenbach et al., 2021 | Germany; 2015 | Not specified in abstract | Rental prices, quality | Quasi-experimental (triple difference event study) | No |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Across 40 studies of rent control policies, the following patterns were observed:
Primary Outcomes Measured:
- Rental prices:Measured in 25 studies.
- Housing supply:Measured in 20 studies.
- Tenant stability:Measured in 16 studies.
- Other outcomes:Measured in various studies.
Rent Control Policy Type:
- First-generation rent control:Studied in 7 studies.
- Second-generation rent control:Studied in 10 studies.
- Third-generation rent control:Studied in 1 study.
Methodology:
- Quasi-experimental methods used in 24 studies.
- Econometric methods used in 21 studies.
Effects on Housing Market Dynamics
| Study | Outcome Measure | Effect Direction | Effect Size | Statistical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond et al., 2019a | Market rents, supply | Increase in rents, decrease in supply | 15% supply reduction, 20% decrease in mobility | No mention found |
| Jofre-Monseny et al., 2023 | Average rents | Decrease in rents | 4–6% reduction | No mention found |
| Munch & Svarer | Tenancy duration | Increase in duration | +6 years | No mention found |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Effects on Tenant Stability and Demographics
Across six studies:
- Outcome measures:
- Rent subsidy or discount: 2 studies.
- Racial disparity measures: 2 studies.
Statistical significance was reported in 3 studies.
References
- Jordi Jofre-Monseny, Rodrigo Martínez-Mazza, M. Segu (2023). Effectiveness and supply effects of high-coverage rent control policies. Regional Science and Urban Economics
- Rebecca Diamond, Timothy J McQuade, Franklin Qian (2019). The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality: Evidence from San Francisco. The American Economic Review
- J. Munch, Michael Svarer (2001). Rent Control and Tenancy Duration
- Andreas Mense, C. Michelsen, Konstantin A. Cholodilin (2017). Empirics on the causal effects of rent control in Germany
- P. Breidenbach, Lea Eilers, Jan Fries (2021). Temporal dynamics of rent regulations – The case of the German rent control. Regional Science and Urban Economics