Elicit: Comparative Analysis of UK Net Zero Incentives (public)

Comparative Analysis of UK Net Zero Incentives (public)

To what extent do UK net zero incentives compare with similar policy approaches in other European countries in driving sustainable business transformation?

UK net zero incentives drive innovation in select industries but are more fragmented compared to other European countries' coordinated policy approaches, which achieve more consistent and uniformly distributed sustainable business transformation outcomes.

Abstract

UK net zero policies employ a diverse mix of instruments—including subsidies, carbon pricing, regulation, and technology support—to prompt sustainable business transformation across sectors such as manufacturing, energy‐intensive industries, and housing. Studies note that these policies support clean technology innovation, knowledge spillovers, and job creation, particularly through strategic industrial initiatives and blended finance. However, several papers describe the UK approach as fragmented, with sector-specific disparities (for example, challenges in integrating sustainable technologies in housing and unequal support in energy-intensive sectors) that can dilute overall impact.
By contrast, research on European policy models reveals that coordinated mechanisms—such as unified carbon pricing schemes, the European Union Emissions Trading System, and targeted incentive funds in countries like the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany—yield more consistent decarbonization outcomes. For instance, benchmark revisions in the steel sector have translated to emission reductions of up to 15%. In summary, while UK incentives drive significant innovation and investment in select industries, the evidence suggests that a more harmonized policy mix, as seen elsewhere in Europe, can offer enhanced and more uniformly distributed transformation outcomes.

Methods

We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 998, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question.

Paper search

Using your research question “To what extent do UK net zero incentives compare with similar policy approaches in other European countries in driving sustainable business transformation?”, we searched across over 126 million academic papers from the Semantic Scholar corpus. We retrieved the 998 papers most relevant to the query.

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

Data extraction

We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Study Country/Region Focus Policy Instruments Examined Business Sectors Analyzed Transformation Outcomes Measured Full text retrieved
Valero and Van Reenen, 2023 United Kingdom (with comparisons to United States, France, Germany, China; sub-regions: Birmingham, Newcastle, London/Oxford/Cambridge) Subsidies, regulation, public investment, innovation support, skills programmes, carbon taxes, blended finance Economy-wide, high-value manufacturing, clean technology innovation Productivity growth, resilience, net zero investment, innovation, job creation, knowledge spillovers Yes
Zenghelis and Bassi, 2014 United Kingdom Fourth Carbon Budget, level playing field policies Carbon-intensive industries Competitiveness, emissions reduction, relocation risk, innovation capacity No
Rezaeian et al., 2024 United Kingdom Zero Carbon Homes (ZCH) transition policy mix Housing sector (incumbent housebuilders) Business model adaptation, integration of sustainable technologies No
Khosravi et al., 2024 United Kingdom (East of England) European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) funding, technical support, knowledge transfer Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) Decarbonisation knowledge, emissions accounting, transition barriers No
Vogl et al., 2020 European Union Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfDs), market creation, European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), subsidies Steel industry Green steel production, cost distribution, market diffusion, emissions reduction Yes
Anderson et al., 2021 Netherlands (comparisons: Korea, United States) Carbon levy, research and development tax credits, technology support, preferential treatment Manufacturing Carbon neutrality, cost-effective deployment, sectoral carbon pricing Yes
Anderson et al., 2023 Netherlands Carbon levy, technology support, preferential treatment Manufacturing Net-zero pathways, policy framework evaluation No
Doś et al., 2023 Poland, Hungary Sustainable finance, disclosure, governance, state ownership Publicly listed companies, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), financial sector Emission target setting, policy exposure, corporate commitment Yes
Hansen et al., 2024 Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom Policy alignment, decarbonization targets, solution prioritization Energy-intensive process industries Target/temporal/solution alignment, investment commitment No
D’Adamo et al., 2023 Europe European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), bonuses for innovation Energy-intensive industries Emissions reduction, competitiveness, policy alternatives No

Thematic Analysis

Carbon Pricing Mechanisms and Business Response

Technology Support and Innovation Incentives

Sectoral Variations in Policy Effectiveness

Policy Design Features Affecting Business Transformation

Comparative Effectiveness Across European Countries

Study Country Key Policy Strengths Business Transformation Outcomes Comparative Advantages/Disadvantages
Valero and Van Reenen, 2023 United Kingdom Strategic industrial policy, blended finance, innovation clusters High returns to clean technology innovation, knowledge spillovers, job creation Strength in innovation, but policy fragmentation and sectoral disparities
Zenghelis and Bassi, 2014 United Kingdom Level playing field, competitiveness focus Enhanced low-carbon innovation, risk of relocation Need for harmonization with trading partners
Anderson et al., 2021/2023 Netherlands Ambitious carbon levy, technology support, gradual removal of exemptions Strong incentives for decarbonization, least-cost deployment Preferential treatment creates unequal pricing, focus on mature technologies
Vogl et al., 2020 European Union Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfDs), market creation, European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) Effective for green steel, global diffusion Unequal cost distribution, regional disparities in renewables access
Doś et al., 2023 Poland, Hungary Sustainable finance, disclosure, governance Increased target setting in Poland, negative impact of state ownership National specificities affect effectiveness, mixed results for policy mixes
Hansen et al., 2024 Denmark, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom Policy alignment, solution prioritization High target alignment, limited investment commitment Temporal misalignment, need for additional support
Graupner et al., 2024 Germany European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), benchmark revisions Up to 15% emissions reduction in steel Benchmark revisions accelerate transformation, current regulations slow investment
Lockwood and Bertels, 2022 Europe Innovation Fund, Stimulation of Sustainable Energy Production and Climate Transition (SDE++), open-access storage Carbon capture and storage (CCS) project deployment, revenue streams Netherlands’ SDE++ offers repeatable support, European Union-wide coordination needed

References

  1. Anna Valero, John Michael Van Reenen (2023). Embedding green industrial policy in a growth strategy for the UK. IPPR Progressive Review
  2. B. Sovacool, M. Iskandarova, F. Geels (2024). Leading the post-industrial revolution? Policy windows, issue linkage and decarbonization dynamics in the UK’s net-zero strategy (2010–2022). Industrial and Corporate Change
  3. Dimitri Zenghelis, S. Bassi (2014). Burden or opportunity? How UK emissions reductions policies affect the competitiveness of businesses
  4. Mina Rezaeian, J. Pinkse, John Rigby (2024). Transition policy mixes and business model adaptation: Incumbent firms' response to zero‐carbon policy in the housing sector. Business Strategy and the Environment
  5. Fatemeh Khosravi, Sam Jelliman, Chidinma Uchendu, Hebba Haddad, Alan Chandler, and 1 more (2024). Policy Recommendations to Enhance Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprise Support for Achieving the UK’s Net Zero Targets. Sustainability
  6. Valentin Vogl, Max Åhman, L. Nilsson (2020). The making of green steel in the EU: a policy evaluation for the early commercialization phase
  7. Bril'e Anderson, E. Cammeraat, Antoine Dechezleprêtre, Luisa Dressler, Nicolas Gonne, and 3 more (2021). Policies for a climate-neutral industry
  8. Bril'e Anderson, E. Cammeraat, Antoine Dechezleprêtre, Luisa Dressler, Nicolas Gonne, and 3 more (2023). Designing policy packages for a climate-neutral industry: A case study from the Netherlands. Ecological Economics
  9. A. Doś, J. Błach, Małgorzata Lipowicz, Francesco Pattarin, Elisa Flori (2023). Institutional Drivers of Voluntary Carbon Reduction Target Setting—Evidence from Poland and Hungary. Sustainability
  10. Teis Hansen, Johnn Andersson, J. Finstad, J. Hanson, Hans Hellsmark, and 3 more (2024). How aligned are industry strategy and government policy for the decarbonization of energy-intensive process industries?. Climate Policy