Elicit: Predictive Markers for NSAA/6MWT in Dystrophinopathies (public)

Predictive Markers for NSAA/6MWT in Dystrophinopathies

Do micro-dystrophin expression and CK decline at 12 months predict NSAA/6MWT at 24–36 months?

Abstract

Micro‐dystrophin expression measured within the first 12 months is reported to parallel later ambulatory function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Studies document that robust micro‐dystrophin induction—ranging from approximately 24% to nearly 40% of normal levels measured at 12 weeks to 12 months—is accompanied by North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) improvements of +1.3 to +7.0 points at 48 weeks to 2 years. In several trials, declines in creatine kinase (e.g., a reduction of about 4,344 units/L) track with such functional gains, and interventions have produced 6‐minute walk test improvements of up to +162 meters.

No study directly models micro‐dystrophin expression or creatine kinase decline as individual predictors of later NSAA or 6‐minute walk test performance, nor do any combine these markers in a single analysis. Instead, group‐level associations and temporal trends consistently link early biomarker shifts with later stabilization or improvement in ambulation outcomes.

Methods

We analyzed 40 sources from an initial pool of 997, using 7 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 6 key aspects that mattered most to the research question. More on methods

Paper search

Using your research question “Do micro-dystrophin expression and CK decline at 12 months predict NSAA/6MWT at 24–36 months?”, we searched across over 126 million academic papers from the Semantic Scholar corpus. We retrieved the 997 papers most relevant to the query.

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

Data extraction

We asked a large language model to extract each data column below from each paper. We gave the model the extraction instructions shown below for each column.

Study Design:

Participant Characteristics:

Extract the following details about participants:

Intervention Details:

Record specific details about the intervention:

Outcome Measures:

Extract the specific outcome measures related to the research question:

Follow-up Duration:

Record:

Key Findings:

Extract the primary findings related to:

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Study Study Design Patient Population Measurement Methods Primary Outcomes Full text retrieved
Mendell et al., 2021a Open-label study 4 ambulatory boys, 4–7 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy Immunofluorescence, Western blot (micro-dystrophin), North Star Ambulatory Assessment Safety, micro-dystrophin expression, North Star Ambulatory Assessment No
Goemans et al., 2016 Open-label extension 12 boys, mean 9.5 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, exon 51 amenable Muscle biopsy (dystrophin), 6-minute walk test Long-term efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics Yes
Pascual-Morena et al., 2020 Systematic review/meta-analysis Children/adolescents with Duchenne muscular dystrophy Pooled clinical trial data Functional outcomes, dystrophin expression No
Rao et al., 2021 Prospective cohort, open-label Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients, age not reported Western blot (micro-dystrophin), functional tests Safety, micro-dystrophin, function No
Goemans et al., 2015a Prospective cohort 269 boys, 3–18 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy 6-minute walk test, North Star Ambulatory Assessment, timed function tests Natural history, biomarkers No
Mendell et al., 2021b Randomized controlled trial, crossover, open-label extension 41 boys, 4–7 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy Western blot (micro-dystrophin), North Star Ambulatory Assessment Safety, efficacy No
Mendell et al., 2013 Randomized controlled trial, open-label extension 12 boys, 7–13 years, exon 51 amenable 6-minute walk test Efficacy, safety No
Mendell et al., 2014 Prospective cohort, randomized controlled trial elements 12 boys, 7–13 years, exon 51 amenable 6-minute walk test, pulmonary function test Efficacy, safety No
Mendell et al., 2023a Randomized controlled trial, crossover, open-label extension 41 boys, ≥4–<8 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy Western blot (micro-dystrophin), North Star Ambulatory Assessment Safety, efficacy No
Zaidman et al., 2021 Open-label, Phase 1b 20 boys, 4–7 years, Duchenne muscular dystrophy Western blot, immunofluorescence (micro-dystrophin), North Star Ambulatory Assessment Expression, safety No

Effects

Predictive Markers at 12 Months

Micro-dystrophin Expression Patterns

Study Marker Type Measurement Time Value Range Correlation with Outcomes
Mendell et al., 2021a Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks Robust expression, correct localization Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment improvement
Goemans et al., 2016 Dystrophin 24, 68/72 weeks Detected in all biopsies No direct correlation found
Rao et al., 2021 Micro-dystrophin 90 days 5–17.5% of normal (Western blot), 10–70% fibers (immunofluorescence) Associated with functional stabilization
Mendell et al., 2021b Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks Primary endpoint met Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment in 4–5 year subgroup
Mendell et al., 2023a Micro-dystrophin 12, 60 weeks Achieved in all patients Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment maintenance
Zaidman et al., 2021 Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks No mention found No mention found
Mendell et al., 2023b Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks 23.8–39.6% of normal Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment stabilization
Flanigan et al., 2022 GALGT2 3–4 months Evidence of expression Subject-level improvement in 1 of 2 subjects
Zaidman et al., 2022 Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks Demonstrated No mention found
Mendell et al., 2024 Micro-dystrophin 12 weeks 34.3% in treated, 0% in placebo Associated with creatine kinase decline, North Star Ambulatory Assessment trend

Creatine Kinase Level Trends

Study Marker Type Measurement Time Value Range Correlation with Outcomes
Mendell et al., 2021a Creatine kinase No mention found Reduction associated with vector Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment improvement
Mendell et al., 2024 Creatine kinase Baseline, 52 weeks -4,344 units/Liter vs. placebo Associated with micro-dystrophin, North Star Ambulatory Assessment trend
Finkel et al., 2018 Muscle enzymes ≥12 weeks Decreased Associated with North Star Ambulatory Assessment improvement
Finkel et al., 2019 Muscle enzymes ≥12 weeks Decreased Associated with functional stabilization
Pascual-Morena et al., 2020 Creatine kinase No mention found No mention found No mention found

Functional Outcomes at 24–36 Months

North Star Ambulatory Assessment Progression

Study Outcome Measure Time Point Result Range Predictive Association
Mendell et al., 2021a North Star Ambulatory Assessment Year 2 +7.0 points Associated with micro-dystrophin
Mendell et al., 2021b North Star Ambulatory Assessment 48 weeks +2.5 (4–5 years, p=0.0172) Associated with micro-dystrophin
Mendell et al., 2023a North Star Ambulatory Assessment 48, 96 weeks +1.3 points at 48 weeks Maintained vs. expected decline
Mendell et al., 2023b North Star Ambulatory Assessment 48, 96 weeks +1.7 (Part 1), +1.3 (Part 2) Associated with micro-dystrophin
Mendell et al., 2024 North Star Ambulatory Assessment 52 weeks +2.57 (treated), +1.92 (placebo) Non-significant group difference
Finkel et al., 2018 North Star Ambulatory Assessment 24–36 weeks Clinically meaningful improvement Associated with creatine kinase decline
Finkel et al., 2019 North Star Ambulatory Assessment Up to 72 weeks Slowing of progression Associated with muscle enzyme decline
Li et al., 2023 North Star Ambulatory Assessment 12 months Decline from age 6 years Natural history reference

6-Minute Walk Test Performance

Study Outcome Measure Time Point Result Range Predictive Association
Goemans et al., 2016 6-minute walk test 177 weeks +8 meters (all), +64 meters (ambulant) Dystrophin detected
Pascual-Morena et al., 2020 6-minute walk test 48 weeks, 3 years +67.3 meters (48 weeks), +151 meters (3 years) Eteplirsen, Drisapersen, Ataluren
Mendell et al., 2017 6-minute walk test 4 years +162 meters (p=0.0005) Eteplirsen vs. controls
Mendell et al., 2016a 6-minute walk test 3 years +151 meters (p<0.01) Eteplirsen vs. controls
Hurley, 2016 6-minute walk test 36 months +151 meters (p<0.01) Eteplirsen vs. controls
Kaye et al., 2014 6-minute walk test 96 weeks +71 meters (p≤0.001) Eteplirsen vs. controls
Goemans et al., 2014 6-minute walk test 96 weeks +46 meters (open-label extension) Drisapersen vs. placebo
Goemans et al., 2015c 6-minute walk test 96 weeks +46 meters (drisapersen), +31 meters at 24 weeks (p=0.003) Drisapersen vs. placebo
Flanigan et al., 2022 6-minute walk test 24 months +73 meters (subject 2) GALGT2 expression

Predictive Relationships

Synthesis and Limitations