Elicit: Resistance Mechanisms in Bictegravir Therapy

Resistance mechanisms for INSTIs and NRTIs in bictegravir/FTC/TAF therapy

Abstract

Ten studies encompassing 19,608 participants demonstrated that bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) exhibits distinct resistance patterns depending on treatment history. Pre-existing NRTI resistance was common in treatment-experienced populations, ranging from 2.7% in treatment-naive individuals to 25% in real-world cohorts, with M184V/I mutations present in 10-16% of participants. Despite this, viral suppression rates remained 96-100% among individuals with archived NRTI resistance, indicating that these mutations do not compromise B/F/TAF efficacy. Pre-existing INSTI resistance was rare (0.6-4%), and treatment-emergent resistance to any B/F/TAF component was absent in randomized trials through 144 weeks but occurred in 3-4% of real-world treatment-experienced populations. The critical resistance mechanism identified was prior INSTI virologic failure, which increased viral rebound risk 2.68-fold, while major INSTI resistance mutations increased risk 4.21-fold. Phenotypic data revealed that Q148H+G140S, which confers high-level resistance to first-generation INSTIs, maintained bictegravir sensitivity at <2.5-fold change, demonstrating bictegravir’s activity against some INSTI-resistant variants. B/F/TAF demonstrates an exceptionally high barrier to de novo resistance development in INSTI-naive populations but faces challenges in individuals with established INSTI resistance from prior treatment failures, while archived NRTI resistance does not predict virologic failure.

Methods

We analyzed 10 sources from an initial pool of 200, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 7 key aspects that mattered most to the research question. More on methods

Records from Elicit search

Papers screened: 200

Papers screened out: 190

Papers included for extraction: 10

Paper search

We performed a semantic search across over 138 million academic papers from the Elicit search engine, which includes all of Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex.

We ran this query: “Resistance mechanisms for INSTIs and NRTIs in bictegravir/FTC/TAF therapy”

The search returned 200 total results from Elicit.

Screening

We screened in sources based on their abstracts that met these criteria:

Results

Characteristics of Included Studies

Ten studies evaluating resistance mechanisms in bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) therapy were included, encompassing 19,608 participants across clinical trials and real-world cohorts.

Study Study Type Sample Size Setting Duration Geographic Location Treatment Status
Pezzati et al., 2026 Cohort study 1414 Real-world cohort (Italian ARCA) 36 months Italy ART-experienced
Andreatta et al., 2020 (BRAAVE) Randomized trial 495 Clinical trial 48 weeks Not mentioned Experienced, virologically suppressed
Acosta et al., 2020 (Study 4030) Phase 3 randomized, double-blind 565 Clinical trial 48 weeks Not mentioned Experienced, switching
Marcelin et al., 2024 (Virostar-1) Retrospective analysis 5986 Real-world cohort (French multicentre database) 3 years (2019-2022) France First-line or second-line
Acosta et al., 2019 (Studies 1489/1490) Randomized trial 1274 Clinical trial 48 weeks Not mentioned Treatment-naive
D’Antoni et al., 2020 Pooled analysis 1907 Phase 3 clinical trials 48 weeks Not mentioned Mixed (1 naive, 19 suppressed in resistance subset)
D’Antoni et al., 2021 Retrospective analysis 20 Clinical trials (7 B/F/TAF studies) 48 weeks Not mentioned Mixed (1 naive, 19 suppressed)
Acosta et al., 2021 (Studies 1489/1490) Phase 3 randomized, double-blind 1274 Clinical trial 144 weeks Australia, Europe, Latin America, North America Treatment-naive
Marcelin et al., 2025 Noninterventional, retrospective, observational 6523 Real-world cohort (French multicentre database) 3 years (2022-2024) France Experienced (≥1 prior regimen)
Andreatta et al., 2019 (Studies 1878/1844) Clinical trial 570 Clinical trial 48 weeks Not mentioned Experienced, switching

Pre-existing Resistance Mutations

Pre-existing NRTI resistance mutations were common across studies, while INSTI resistance mutations were rare.

Study NRTI Resistance Prevalence Specific NRTI Mutations INSTI Resistance Prevalence Specific INSTI Mutations Detection Method
Pezzati et al., 2026 25% (95% CI: 22.5-27.1) Not mentioned 0.6% (95% CI: 0.2-1.4) Not mentioned Not mentioned
Andreatta et al., 2020 (BRAAVE) 14% (70/495) M184V/I: 10% (51/495)
TAMs: 7% (34/495)
Primary INSTI-R detected post-randomization: 2% (11/495) Not mentioned Historical genotypes and proviral DNA genotyping
Acosta et al., 2020 (Study 4030) 24% (138/565) M184V/I: 14% (81/565)
K65R/E/N or ≥3 TAMs: 5% (30/565)
4% (20/565) Not mentioned Historical plasma HIV-1 RNA genotypes and baseline proviral DNA genotypes
Marcelin et al., 2024 (Virostar-1) Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned
Acosta et al., 2019 (Studies 1489/1490) 2.7% M41L, K219E/N/Q/R 1.3% T97A, Q148H (with G140S) Retrospective deep-sequencing using deepType HIV assay
D’Antoni et al., 2020 Not mentioned Not mentioned 1.0% (20/1907) E92G, Y143C, Y143H, S147G, N155S, Q148H, Q148K, Q148R, R263K
Combination: Q148H + G140S
Historical genotypes and/or deepType HIV assay, GenoSure IN, GenoSure Archive
D’Antoni et al., 2021 Not mentioned Not mentioned 1.0% (20/1907) E92G, Y143C/H, S147G, Q148H/K/R, N155S, R263K Historical genotypes and/or baseline RNA or DNA sequencing
Acosta et al., 2021 (Studies 1489/1490) 2.7% (35/1274) M41L, K219E/N/Q/R, K65R/E 1.3% (17/1270) T97A, Q148H with G140S Retrospective baseline next-generation sequencing (≥15% cutoff)
Marcelin et al., 2025 Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned
Andreatta et al., 2019 (Studies 1878/1844) 16% (89/543) M184V/I: 10% (54/543) Not mentioned Not mentioned Historical genotypes and proviral DNA

Treatment-Emergent Resistance

Treatment-emergent resistance to B/F/TAF components was rare across studies.

Study Emergent INSTI Resistance Emergent NRTI Resistance Emergent Dual Resistance Duration of Follow-up
Pezzati et al., 2026 Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned 36 months
Andreatta et al., 2020 (BRAAVE) No emergent resistance No emergent resistance No emergent resistance 48 weeks
Acosta et al., 2020 (Study 4030) None detected None detected None detected 48 weeks
Marcelin et al., 2024 (Virostar-1) 4% emergent INSTI or NRTI RAMs 4% emergent INSTI or NRTI RAMs Complete absence of dual NRTI and INSTI resistance 3 years (2019-2022)
Acosta et al., 2019 (Studies 1489/1490) None observed None observed None observed 48 weeks
D’Antoni et al., 2020 Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned 48 weeks
D’Antoni et al., 2021 Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned 48 weeks
Acosta et al., 2021 (Studies 1489/1490) None None None 144 weeks
Marcelin et al., 2025 3% treatment-emergent RAMs 3% treatment-emergent RAMs Dual INSTI and NRTI RAMs observed 3 years (2022-2024)
Andreatta et al., 2019 (Studies 1878/1844) No emergent resistance No emergent resistance No emergent resistance 48 weeks

Virologic Outcomes

High rates of viral suppression were maintained across studies, including among participants with pre-existing resistance mutations.

Study Overall Viral Suppression Suppression with Pre-existing NRTI Resistance Suppression with Pre-existing INSTI Resistance Virologic Failure Rate
Pezzati et al., 2026 Not mentioned B/F/TAF remained effective despite NRTI-DRMs Not mentioned Viral rebound by 36 months: 5.3% (95% CI: 3.7-6.9%)
Andreatta et al., 2020 (BRAAVE) Week 48: 99% (324/327) B/F/TAF, 100% (162/162) SBR to B/F/TAF 100% (68/68) with NRTI-R 100% (11/11) with INSTI-R No failures with de novo resistance
Acosta et al., 2020 (Study 4030) High rates maintained through Week 48 Maintained suppression Not mentioned Uncommon; blips in 2.7%
Marcelin et al., 2024 (Virostar-1) Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned 6.8%
Acosta et al., 2019 (Studies 1489/1490) High rates through week 48 Maintained suppression Not mentioned 13 participants (1.0%) met criteria for analysis
D’Antoni et al., 2020 Week 48: All achieved virologic success (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL) Not mentioned All achieved suppression Not mentioned
D’Antoni et al., 2021 19 suppressed at baseline maintained suppression throughout 48 weeks Not mentioned All maintained suppression without viral blips Not mentioned
Acosta et al., 2021 (Studies 1489/1490) Week 144: 98% with transmitted DRS, 97% without Maintained suppression similar to those without Not mentioned No emergent resistance
Marcelin et al., 2025 Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned 6%
Andreatta et al., 2019 (Studies 1878/1844) 98% (561/570) overall 98% (213/217) with pre-existing resistance Not mentioned Not mentioned

Risk Factors for Virologic Failure

Prior INSTI virologic failure and the presence of major INSTI resistance mutations emerged as the primary risk factors for viral rebound on B/F/TAF therapy.

Study Risk Factors Identified Statistical Associations
Pezzati et al., 2026 History of INSTI virological failure
Major INSTI-DRMs
History of INSTI VF: aRH 2.68 (95% CI: 1.40-5.12)
Major INSTI-DRMs: aRH 4.21 (95% CI: 1.18-15.02)
Andreatta et al., 2020 (BRAAVE) Pre-existing NRTI-R, NNRTI-R, and PI-R present in 14%, 21%, and 13% respectively
M184V/I and TAMs detected in 10% and 7%
Not mentioned
Acosta et al., 2020 (Study 4030) Pre-existing NRTI-R mutations (24%)
K65R/E/N or ≥3 TAMs (5%)
Not mentioned
Marcelin et al., 2024 (Virostar-1) Not mentioned Not mentioned
Acosta et al., 2019 (Studies 1489/1490) Low adherence (<95%) and missed doses No statistical significance (P >0.05) for preexisting resistance or subtype
D’Antoni et al., 2020 Pre-existing primary INSTI-R substitutions
Patient characteristics: 75% male, 30% white, 85% HIV-1 subtype B
Not mentioned
D’Antoni et al., 2021 Baseline resistance: preexisting primary INSTI-R substitutions
Demographics: predominantly male (75%), Black (65%), HIV-1 subtype B (85%)
Not mentioned
Acosta et al., 2021 (Studies 1489/1490) Pre-existing resistance substitutions did not affect treatment outcomes No statistical significance (P >0.05)
Marcelin et al., 2025 Not mentioned Not mentioned
Andreatta et al., 2019 (Studies 1878/1844) Pre-existing primary resistance substitutions in 40%
Pre-switch NRTI resistance in 16%
M184V/I mutations in 10%
Not mentioned

Resistance Mechanisms

Limited mechanistic data on resistance to B/F/TAF components were available across the included studies. One study with full-text availability provided phenotypic resistance data for specific mutations. The Q148H+G140S combination in integrase showed high-level resistance to raltegravir and elvitegravir but remained sensitive to bictegravir, with a fold-change of 2.14. This pattern demonstrated differential cross-resistance between INSTIs, with mutations conferring resistance to first-generation INSTIs not necessarily affecting bictegravir sensitivity.

Most studies did not report detailed mechanistic data on phenotypic resistance levels, compensatory mutations, or fitness costs associated with resistance to B/F/TAF components.

Synthesis

The evidence demonstrates consistently low rates of treatment-emergent resistance to B/F/TAF across diverse populations and settings, yet reveals important distinctions in resistance patterns between treatment-naive and treatment-experienced populations, particularly those with prior INSTI exposure.