Elicit: B-cell Biomarkers and Ocrelizumab Response
B-cell Biomarkers and Ocrelizumab Response
Which biomarkers of B-cell depletion correlate with clinical response to ocrelizumab?
CD19+ B-cell counts, plasmablast levels, baseline regulatory cell populations (CD49d+ T-cells and B-1a cells), and CD8+ T-cell depletion correlate with clinical response to ocrelizumab, with the relative importance of each biomarker varying by MS subtype and baseline inflammatory status.
Abstract
Multiple biomarkers of B-cell depletion correlate with clinical response to ocrelizumab, though their predictive value varies by clinical context. Total CD19+ B-cell depletion showed consistent associations with outcomes in RRMS, with higher ocrelizumab exposure producing lower B-cell counts and reduced disability progression (HR 0.64, p=0.0135). Baseline CD19+ counts predicted repopulation kinetics, with counts ≥12-14% identifying patients at risk for fast repopulation and higher MRI activity (17.39% vs. 2.53%, p=0.008). Plasmablast levels emerged as particularly informative: responders at 24 months had 3-fold lower plasmablasts at 6 months compared to non-responders (7.69% vs. 22.66%, p=0.043), and plasmablast populations correlated positively with 12-month EDSS scores (R=0.564, p=0.004). However, in PPMS, baseline inflammatory status determined which biomarkers mattered—B-cell repopulation and serum neurofilament levels predicted outcomes in Gd+ patients, while serum IgA levels and T-cell remodeling were more relevant in Gd- patients. Elevated baseline regulatory populations (CD49d+ T-cells, B-1a cells) predicted achievement of NEDA-3 status, while CD8+ T-cell modulation correlated with disability outcomes (OR=1.01, p=0.02). Treatment-naive patients demonstrated stronger biomarker-outcome correlations than previously treated patients (HR=2.53 for radiological activity with prior treatment, p=0.039), suggesting prior therapies modify B-cell compartment dynamics and diminish predictive accuracy of standard depletion metrics.
Methods
We analyzed 10 sources from an initial pool of 200, using 8 screening criteria. Each paper was reviewed for 5 key aspects that mattered most to the research question.
Records from Elicit search
- n = 200
- Papers screened using: Ocrelizumab Treatment, B-cell Depletion Biomarkers, Clinical Response Outcomes, Quantitative Correlation Analysis, Follow-up Biomarker Measurements, Adequate Sample Size, Full-text Publication, Ocrelizumab-specific Data.
- n = 200 Papers screened out
- n = 190 Papers included for extraction
Paper search
We performed a semantic search across over 138 million academic papers from the Elicit search engine, which includes all of Semantic Scholar and OpenAlex.
We ran this query: "Which biomarkers of B-cell depletion correlate with clinical response to ocrelizumab?"
The search returned 200 total results from Elicit. We retrieved 200 papers most relevant to the query for screening.
Data extraction
We asked a large language model to extract detailed data on:
- B-Cell Depletion Biomarkers: Extract specific biomarkers and their measurement units, baseline values, follow-up values, depletion patterns, and categorizations used.
- Clinical Response Measures: Include outcomes such as annualized relapse rate, EDSS scores, composite measures, etc., along with assessment timepoints.
- Biomarker-Response Correlations: Report associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes, including statistical measures like correlation coefficients and p-values.
- Patient Characteristics: Collect data on MS subtype, disease duration, previous treatment, demographics, and sample size.
- Key Findings: Summarize main conclusions, clinical implications, recommendations for monitoring or dosing strategies, limitations, and future research directions.
Results
Characteristics of Included Studies
All 10 studies evaluated biomarkers of B-cell depletion in patients treated with ocrelizumab, though they varied in MS subtype, sample size, and follow-up duration.
| Study | Full text retrieved? | MS Subtype | Sample Size | Follow-up Duration | Previous Treatment | Baseline EDSS (median/mean) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Hauser et al., 2023 | Yes | RRMS and PPMS | Not specified | 96 weeks (RRMS), variable (PPMS) | Randomized to ocrelizumab or comparator | Not specified |
| Ece Akbayır et al., 2025 | Yes | RRMS | 31 | 12 months | Previously treated, resistant to first-line agents | Not specified |
| M. Boziki et al., 2022 | Yes | Active PPMS | 22 | 24 months | Treatment-naive for immunosuppressants | 4.91 (mean) |
| J. I. Fernández-Velasco et al., 2021 | Yes | PPMS | 53 | 6 months | Not specified | 6 (median) |
| Alice Willison et al., 2025 | Yes | RRMS | 34 OCR, 25 OFA, 20 treatment-naive | 12 months | Median 1 previous DMT (OCR and OFA groups); 25 treatment-naive | 2.00 (median) |
| M. Cellerino et al., 2021 | Yes | RRMS (n=93), PPMS (n=43), SPMS (n=17) | 153 | 1.9 years (median) | 76.95% previously treated | Lower baseline EDSS associated with better outcomes |
| Hany Mohammed Amin Aref et al., 2024 | No | RRMS | 30 | 12 months | Most had two previous DMTs; 13.3% treatment-naive | 4.5 (median) |
| G. Abbadessa et al., 2021 | Yes | RRMS (n=127), SPMS (n=43), PPMS (n=48) | 218 (155 at 12 months) | At least 6 months; 155 with 12-month follow-up | 76.95% previously treated; 23.04% treatment-naive | Not specified |
| J. I. Fernández-Velasco et al., 2022 | Yes | PPMS | 69 | 12 months | Not specified | 5.5 (median) |
| Nicola Capasso et al., 2022 | Yes | RRMS, SPMS, PPMS | 78 | 36.5 months (mean) | Previous DMTs collected at baseline | Not specified |
The included studies represented diverse MS populations, with sample sizes ranging from 22 to 218 patients. Most studies (8 of 10) had full-text availability. Follow-up durations ranged from 6 months to 36.5 months. The majority of patients across studies had prior treatment exposure, though several studies included treatment-naive cohorts. Baseline disability varied substantially, with median/mean EDSS scores ranging from 2.00 to 6.0, reflecting heterogeneity in disease severity.
B-Cell Depletion Biomarkers Measured
Studies employed diverse approaches to quantify B-cell depletion, though CD19+ B cells emerged as the most commonly measured biomarker. Specific findings included:
- Baseline CD19 B cell counts of 65.98 ± 79.04 cells/μl, depleting to 3.59 ± 2.94 cells/μl at 1 month, 25.6 ± 43.98 cells/μl at 6 months, and 11.11 ± 19.53 cells/μl at 12 months.
- Other studies quantified specific B-cell subsets beyond total CD19+ counts, measuring unique populations like plasmablasts and memory B cells.
- Patients were categorized based on repopulation kinetics with classifications of fast and slow repopulation.
Clinical Response Measures
Studies used heterogeneous outcome measures to assess clinical response to ocrelizumab:
- Disability Progression: Included measures like confirmed disability progression (CDP) and EDSS scores.
- Relapse-Related Outcomes: Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was analyzed and showed significant reductions across studies.
- MRI Outcomes: Variability in MRI outcomes assessed new/enlarging lesions and brain volume changes.
- Composite Measures: NEDA-3 defined as absence of relapses and confirmed disability worsening.
Biomarker-Clinical Response Correlations
Total B-Cell and CD19+ Depletion
Associations between ocrelizumab exposure, B-cell depletion, and clinical outcomes showed:
- Higher exposure correlated with lower B-cell counts and higher rates of disability progression.
- Statistically significant relationships between CD19 B cell counts and disability and radiological outcomes were observed.
B-Cell Subset Correlations
Significant roles of plasmablasts as predictors of treatment response across multiple studies were identified.
Regulatory Cell Populations
Elevated baseline populations of regulatory T cells were predictive of better outcomes, reinforcing the role of the immune environment post-treatment.
Patient-Level Predictors
Notably, lower baseline EDSS and treatment-naive status were associated with more favorable clinical responses, suggesting previous treatments may hinder the efficacy of ocrelizumab.
Synthesis
The studies reveal complex, context-dependent relationships between B-cell depletion biomarkers and clinical response to ocrelizumab. Furthermore, it highlights that different markers might be relevant depending on clinical context, suggesting a multifaceted immune response to treatment.
References
- Ece Akbayır et al., 2025. B-Cell and T-Cell Populations in Peripheral Blood Linked to Ocrelizumab Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis. In Vivo.
- M. Boziki et al., 2022. Ocrelizumab in Patients with Active Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers of Treatment Response. Cells.
- J. I. Fernández-Velasco et al., 2021. Effect of Ocrelizumab in Blood Leukocytes of Patients With Primary Progressive MS. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.
- Alice Willison et al., 2025. Effects of Anti-CD20 Antibody Therapy on Immune Cell Dynamics in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Cells.
- M. Cellerino et al., 2021. Predictors of Ocrelizumab Effectiveness in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics.
- Hany Mohammed Amin Aref et al., 2024. Follow Up of Total B Cells (CD 19) Count after B Cell Depleting Therapy in Relapse Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Disorder in Egyptian Patients. The Quarterly journal of medicine.
- G. Abbadessa et al., 2021. CD19 Cell Count at Baseline Predicts B Cell Repopulation at 6 and 12 Months in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Ocrelizumab. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
- J. I. Fernández-Velasco et al., 2022. Baseline Inflammatory Status Reveals Dichotomic Immune Mechanisms Involved In Primary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Pathology. Frontiers in Immunology.
- Nicola Capasso et al., 2022. Ocrelizumab effect on humoral and cellular immunity in multiple sclerosis and its clinical correlates: a 3-year observational study. Journal of Neurology.
- S. Hauser et al., 2023. Association of Higher Ocrelizumab Exposure With Reduced Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.