### Introduction

Hi there,<br>Last month, we introduced [Elicit Systematic Review](https://blog.elicit.com/systematic-review/), a new AI workflow that allows researchers to find papers, screen titles and abstracts, and extract data from full-text papers in 80% less time, without compromising accuracy.

Today we’re excited to announce our [latest blog post](https://blog.elicit.com/p/f2edd1e9-7d5f-4388-9065-542c459651c6/) describing how we evaluated this workflow. In short, we compared Elicit’s screening recommendations to published systematic reviews and found that **Elicit correctly screens in 94% of papers**. We (and independent teams) also compared Elicit's extractions against manual extractions and found that **Elicit extracts data with 94-99% accuracy**.

By providing screening and extraction accuracy rivaling humans at a fraction of the cost and labor, we're excited to usher in a new era in evidence synthesis.

Check out the [blog post](https://blog.elicit.com/how-we-evaluated-elicit-systematic-review/) to learn more about our evaluation methodology and results.

[**Read the Blog Post**](https://blog.elicit.com/how-we-evaluated-elicit-systematic-review/)